Page 1
Standard

Short story: We Miss Those Days

Someone said, looking at the past could make you can’t see the future. Well, I disagree with that. Because sometimes, the past could make you remember what happen in your life, make you laugh and make you remember who you are.

The weather was so hot; as expected from the city that famous with the friendly cool weather. It would be very nice, if I could swim in the cold water. It kind of reminded me something about what I always did when the weather was hot like these days and I really missed those days. Because at that time, I always found a way to have fun. Fourteen years ago when I was 6 years old, I lived in Banten. That city always has such a hot weather every day. Even, when the wind blew, it couldn’t reduce the hotness. I always felt exhausted when I went home from school, because sometimes I should walk home on foot. You could imagine the weather when the sun was up on your head. It felt like your head, hair and body were burn. Suddenly, a great idea popped out in my head.

At that time, I really looked forward to go home. Although, I had to go through the hot weather, I had something that could make me cooling down. At my home, I had a special and lovely large container. This large container was covered with blue ceramic and a faucet in the middle. I have two, sometimes three, broom fishes in the large container and I liked to play with it.
As soon as I was home, there was no one at home beside my little brother; we were just a year apart. My father always wasted his time in grandma’s home while my mother worked. My older sister and brother had not home yet. Therefore, I had quality time to pleasure myself. I was very close with my brother, we played and studied together. Although he was a guy, he liked to play dolls, cook and pretend to be a hair designer. However, between some games that we liked, we have one special game. It was nose-diving on the large container. At that moment, perhaps we thought it was fun. In such hot weather, we were swimming in it. The large container was enough for 3 children, so there was some space for us. We play with the broom fishes. We took it out from the water, pretended it was a plane, and made it crush each other. As a consequence, the broom fishes died every time we had played. It was really cruel, but it was really fun back then. Even though, many times our back or head have accidentally bump into the faucet, we never stopped to play in it. However, the ‘strange’ thing was, when we wanted to pee, we out from the large container and after we finished we entered it again. We always played in the large container when our parents not home, but when they home while we were diving; we were hurrying to get off, wearing our clothes and pretending open the book to study. Thus, when our parents, especially our mom came, she looked at us with smile on face. She said, “Wow, my children are so nice, already took a bath and now, studying.”
She doesn’t know if we have swam in our large container. After that, she would take a bath and the water was already we used to play. Now, every time I remember those days, I always felt regret but also having fun. Regret, because I did something bad to my parents, they have to use the water that I used before. Fun, because it was the funniest game that I ever did with my little brother. Nowadays, I couldn’t play like that with my little brother again. Sometimes, we talked about it and laughed of it. Yeah, both of us miss those days.

Standard

Existentialism of the Story of King Arthur

The story of King Arthur is one of the folklores for children that many people suspected as a history of British Empire, because the story of King Arthur was folklore so there wasn’t an author for the story. However, the story of King Arthur has been published by retold from some authors and the story of King Arthur that I would discuss was The Story of King Arthur and His Knights retold from Howard Pyle original by Tania Zamorsky. In this story, I see there is a process to prove self, to make the existence, to define what they are. As Sartre said, “Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself (pg.445).” and “If man, as the existentialist conceives him, is indefinable, it is because at first he is nothing. Only afterward will he be something, and be himself will have made what he will be (pg. 445).”
When a man born he was nothing until he chose to be something and made his existence. It is what I wanted to discuss, in the story of King Arthur, there are some characters that show their existence to prove themselves and to make their existence be known. Every character in this story has a process to define and to make existence of their life, but I will focus on one character, King Arthur tough I will also analyze some characters that text show if he or she has existence issue. As I see from Sartre’s opinion if at first man is nothing but after he go through his live then he can create the value of his live by doing something to make every men aware of his existence. At first Arthur born, his life was in great danger because of battle of power, so Merlin, a wizard told Arthur’s father, Uther Pendragon, to let Merlin hide his son for Arthur’s safety. When Arthur born he was nothing, but his father was someone with a great existence. Uther Pendragon was a king of Britain, so his father could make Arthur existence because of what he chose. He chose to hide him, although it would make everyone didn’t know Arthur but Arthur still exist. Just like Sartre claimed, “We do not only mean that he is responsible for his own individuality, but that he is responsible for all men (pg.445).” Uther was responsible for his own life’s child and Merlin who told Uther about Arthur also have responsible for that. Then Merlin demanded Sir Ector to take care of Arthur as his own child. Sir Ector has one son, Sir Kay and Arthur became his brother. When Sir Kay made an existence of his life, went to many battles, tournaments, while Arthur was just a serving boy, Kay’s esquire-at-arms, very much like a knight’s assistant. However, after young Arthur appeared at a scene that set up by Merlin and he knew who he was, he started to make a value of his live as a new king of Britain. Merlin brought Arthur to pull out the sword from the anvil to prove that he was the rightful King of Britain. “Man exists, turns up, appears on the scene, and, only afterward, defines himself (pg. 445).” It was what Sartre revealed on his essay. When a man exists and shows himself, he will start to define himself. It happened to Arthur when he became a King of Britain. After he became King, he won many battles, tournaments, and duels. One day King Arthur fought with King Pellinore because of he wanted to get revenge of his wounded knights, Sir Myles and Sir Griflet. As I see on the text, King Arthur went to the Sable Knight to have a duel with him because he thought that his knights’ dignity and his pride were hurt by that, the Sable Knight hung his knights’ shield on tree. So that, he wanted to recover it but he almost lost, luckily he was safe by Merlin. “Existentialism’s first move is to make every man aware of what he is and to make the full responsibility of his existence rest on him (pg. 445).” To continue of proving Arthur’s existence, the text shows that he tried to make his existence continue by fighting again with Sable Knight, King Pellinore. He willed to be a great King that could defend his pride and his knights. Beside the people of his country that he wanted to show, King Arthur also wanted to make himself sure about his being, “Not only is man what he conceives himself to be, but he is also only what he wills himself to be after this thrust toward existence (pg. 445).” One day, King Arthur fell in love with Lady Guinevere when she had come upon him like an angel while he lay wounded in the forest. He heard that Lady Guinevere was in disadvantage so he came to help but he disguised himself to secretly watch her. Merlin gave him a magical cap that would make him like a different person. King Arthur worked as a gardener boy in the Lady Guinevere garden. For a while King Arthur became somebody else, stopped his existence as a King of Britain and made new existence as a gardener boy. However, what I see from the text is that a gardener boy is not a new existence of King Arthur, it is King Arthur existence. Because when he decided to be someone else to protect Lady Guinevere he just did something to remain his existence, he fell in love so to carry on his Lady, a woman that he wanted to be his future, he created something possible to make it happened, “We shall confine ourselves to reckoning only with what depends upon our will, or on the ensemble of probabilities which make our action possible (pg. 449).” To make Lady Guinevere his wife, he fought Duke Mordaunt, the man that threated Lady Guinevere’s land and demanded her to be his wife. After wounded Duke Mordaunt for first round, he went to forest and met his knights, Sir Geraint, Sir Gawaine, Sir Ewaine, and Sir Pellias. Four of them asked to have a duel with him, and then King Arthur had overthrown and sent four of them to serve Lady Guinevere for seven days while they didn’t know who the knight that beat them was. Lady Guinevere amused for the knights that White Champion sent to her but she was thinking that it was very strange that when the White Champion was around the gardener boy was not and vice versa. The other action the text said that King Arthur did for Lady Guinevere; he revealed his existence as King of Britain to make his knights went to second round battle with Duke Mordaunt and his knights. He was a King of Britain and realized that he have big responsibilities for his own people’s future and for beating Duke Mordaunt and his knights to prevent him marry Lady Guinevere and take the land, he chose to take his knights to and fought Duke Mordaunt. King Arthur became a law-maker for everyone because he realized that it was his responsibility, just like Sartre explained, “The man who involves himself and who realizes that he is not only the person he chooses to be, but also a law-maker who is, at the same time, choosing all mankind as well as himself, cannot help escape the feeling of his total and deep responsibility (pg. 446).” After beat King Arthur and his four Knights beat Duke Mordaunt and his knights, King Arthur and Lady Guinevere were married on a beautiful fall day in a ceremony of great splendor.
King Arthur was a great king; he defended his country, his knights, and his being with sincerity, full of responsibilities that were why his knights and people were really respect and willing to sacrifice to protect King and Britain that they loved. When King Arthur was in danger because of his sister Morgana le Fay, his knights and Merlin have protected him, also while King Arthur went to the battle, his knights were faithfully, loyally to serve King Arthur to win the battle. However, how powerful and loyal his knights were, King Arthur’s knights were a mere human, sometimes to prove their King existence, his knights also have to prove their existence, even if it could danger their life. Sometimes they have to make their own decision, save their life or defend their King’s pride but in the text for some knights whatever choice they chose it never could not make both of things that they preserve can be secure. They just could have one side. As Sartre said, “Subjectivism means, on the one hand, that an individual chooses and makes himself; and, on the other, that it is impossible for man to transcend human subjectivity (pg. 445). However, some of them could defend both of it, their King’s pride and their life while they transcend human nature. Just like Sir Pellias, he was became spirit of the land of fairy. All of the man in the text has been showed that all of them made their existence just like what they have planned and they did, not what they would want to be, “Man will be what he will have planned to be. Not what he will want to be (pg. 445).”

References
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1985. Existentialism and Human Emoticons. Philosophical Library and Carol Publishing Co.
Zamorsky, Tania. 2006. The Story of King Arthur and His Knights / retold from the original story by Howard Pyle. New York. Sterling Publishing Co.

Standard

Daftar Pustaka

Aapola, Sinikka, Marnina Gonick and Anita Harris. (2005). Young Femininity: Girlhood, Power and Social Change. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Brown, Lyn Mikel. (1998). Raising Their Voices: The Politics of Girls’ Anger. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Bordo, Susan. (1999b). Feminism, Foucault and the Politic of the Body. In Price, Janet and Margrit Shildrick (Ed.), Feminist Theory and the Body (pp. 246-257): Taylor and Francis. (sudah dibaca) (2.1.1)

Bordo, Susan. (1999). Beauty (Re)Discovers the Male Body. In Straus. Farrar, and Giroux (Ed.), Male Body: a New Look at Men in Oublic and in Private (pp. 168-225). (sedang dibaca) (2.1.2 and 2.3.3)

Butler, Judith. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge. (belum dibaca)

Butler, Judith. (1994). “Against Proper Objects”. More Gender Trouble: Feminism Meets Queer Theory. (pp. 1-26.). Spec, issue of differences 6.2-3. (belum dibaca)

Butler, Judith. (1993). Bodies that Matter. Bodies that Matter on the Discursive Limits of Sex (pp. 3-27). New York: Routledge. (belum dibaca) (2.1.1)

Chatman, Seymour. (1978). Story and Discourse Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Coward, Rosalind. (1992). The Body Beautiful. In Schaum, Melita and Connie Flanagan (Ed.), Gender Images: Reding for Composition (pp. 412-419): Houghton Mifflin. (belum dibaca) (2.1.2)

De Beauvoir, Simone. (1989). The Second Sex. Trans. H.M. Parshley. 1952. New York:Vintage Books. (belum dibaca)

Frost, Liz. (2001). Young Woman and the Body. New York: Palgrave. (belum dibaca)

Gatens, Moira. (1999). Power, Bodies and Difference. In Price, Janet and Margrit Shildrick (Ed.), Feminist Theory and the Body (pp. 227-234): Taylor and Francis. (sudah dibaca) (2.2.1)

Grosz, Elizabeth. (1999). Psychoanalysis and the Body. In Price, Janet and Margrit Shildrick (Ed.), Feminist Theory and the Body (pp. 267-271): Taylor and Francis. (sudah dibaca)

Halberstam, Judith. (1998). Female Masculinity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)
Harris, Anita. (2004). All About the Girl: Culture, Power, and Identity. New York and London. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca) (2.2.1)

Harris, Anita. (2004). Future Girl: Young Women in the Twenty-First Century. New York and London: Routledge. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Julia Kristeva, (1982), Approaching Abjection, Powers of Horror. (pp: 1 – 31). Columbia University Press, NY. (belum dibaca) (2.1.3)

Lenz, Millicent and Ramona M. Mahood. (1980). Young Adult Literature Background and Criticism. Chicago: American Library Association. (sudah dibaca)

Minh-ha, Trinh. T. (1999). Write Your Body and The Body in Theory. In Price, Janet and Margrit Shildrick (Ed.), Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader (pp. 258-266): Taylor and Francis. (sudah dibaca)

Riley, Denise. (1999). Bodies, Identities, Feminism. In Price, Janet and Margrit Shildrick (Ed.), Feminist Theory and the Body (pp. 220-226): Taylor and Francis. (sudah dibaca)

Silverman, Kaja. Male Subjectivity at the Margins. New York and London:Routledge, 1992. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Simmons, Rachel. (2002). Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. Orlando, Austin, New York, San Diego, Toronto, London: Harcourt, Inc. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

White, Barbara A. (1985). Growing Up Female: Adolescent Girlhood in American Fiction. London: Greenwood Press. (belum bisa diakses/belum dibaca)

Younger, Beth. (2009). Learning Curves Body Images and Female Sexuality in Young Adult Literature. Maryland: Scarecrow Press Inc. (belum dibaca)

Standard

Beauty and Body Image in Two Novels by Joyce Carol Oates

In this paper, I’d like to discuss an issue for my future research with a title Body and Beauty Image in Two Novels by Joyce Carol Oates. The novels are Big Mouth & Ugly Girl and Freaky Green Eyes. I find several problems related to the issue of body and beauty image in these novels. They are how the protagonists in these novels describe their bodies; how they accept their bodies; how their bodies affect their life; and what they feel about their bodies. Furthermore, before the discussion I’d like to tell you the summary of the novels.
Big Mouth & Ugly Girl is a young-adult novel by Oates which is released in 2003. The story is about a teenage girl, Ursula Riggs who doesn’t care what other people think about her. Ursula likes to confront people, especially when she knows she’s right and she is going to win the fight. That is Ugly Girl’s way. She calls herself Ugly Girl. Sometimes being Ugly Girl makes her has more power, she can do anything and be anything. She turns her lack becomes her excess. However, Ursula feels that her father and mother always seem to be more interesting in her sister than her. Her sister is beautiful and skinny, while Ursula Riggs is taller and bigger than most of the girls, some boys, even teachers. Somehow, people around her feel nervous or disturb by her attitude or her physical. And yes, she almost has no friend. One day, her classmate, Matt Donaghy, is going to be arrested because there is an accusation that he will blow up the school. Ursula doesn’t believe it and tries to free Matt from the false charge. Matt is free because of her. She is the only one who trusts in him while everybody avoids him. However, they don’t become friend because Ursula keeps avoiding Matt. Until, she accidently sees him when Matt is going to suicide. She stops it. Then, they become really close so people start to talk about them. Ugly Girl and Big Mouth are dating. Ursula feels different; while she’s with Matt she doesn’t have to use Ugly Girl. Then, it seems everything is much better in Ursula’s life.
Freaky Green Eyes is a young-adult novel by Oates which is released in 2003. The story starts with an alteration of a girl’s life. Francesca Pierson or Franky is a normal teenage girl, until one day everything changes. Freaky comes to her life. Freaky Green Eyes she calls her and it seems no one knows that she exists. Freaky comes to her at that night, when she is about to be raped and Freaky saves her life. She says, “Freaky Green Eyes, he called me. FREAKY GREEN EYES SAVED MY LIFE.” After that, Freaky always seems to know what has happened in Franky’s family while, Franky doesn’t want to know (accept) it. When Franky’s mom disappears, she blames her for leaving their family. Everyone is talking about it; police and reporter are investigating her father. Franky, her brother Todd, and her little sister Samantha swear if their dad is innocent and their mom is leaving of her own decision. Freaky always tries to tell her to convince her that Franky herself already knows the truth, but she doesn’t listen. Until, she has a dream and knows that it is a sign. Freaky tells her to follow the sign because if she follows it, she will find her mother at the end. However, what she finds is different from what she expects.
Having finished describing the story of the novels, I’d like to show you some of works related to the issues I find in the novels. They are:
1. A thesis for the degree of Scholar of Literature with a title Konstruksi Tubuh & Tehnik Espitolari Tiga Novel Gotik Abad ke-19 by Yolanda Priska Sari 2011 Universitas Padjadjaran,
2. A thesis for the degree of Master of Nursing with a title Young Women’s Voices on Body Image: The Beauty Myth, by Nadine P. Johnson November 1994 Dalhousie University,
3. A thesis with a title Grotesque Physicality: Female Excess in Angela Carter’s “Nights at the Circus by Helga Valborg Steinarsdóttir September 2009 Universitis Islandiae Sigillum,
4. A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Literature (Feminist Studies) with a title Girl Avengers: Revising Feminist Approaches to Sexuality, Violence, and Power in Representation, by Katie M. Kanagawa December 2009 University of California.
1. The thesis by Yolanda Priska sari. This thesis analyzes body construction (grotesque body) in three gothic novels. It identifies that grotesque body is an abnormal body image just like there is a physical defect in that body. This thesis discusses a body that is supposed to be non-human body, for example like Frankenstein’s body. However, the main idea of this thesis can be related to the issue of body image. This research focuses on the concept of normal and abnormal bodies in society and how society and the character perceive it. The problem of the body is because there is a problem on what people (society) think about it. “Penggambaran tubuh normal disini merupakan penggambaran tubuh manusia pada umumnya yang sempurna, mempunyai anggota badan yang lengkap dan tinggi yang masih dalam batas normal. Penggambaran tubuh grotesk merupakan penggambaran tubuh tidak normal, seperti adanya kecacatan dalam tubuh tersebut.” (Sari, 2011).
According to Sari, the body image can be perceived in the protagonist, Ursula Riggs (Big Mouth & Ugly Girl). In Ursula’s perspective, she has an [un]usual body because she’s taller than any girls, some boys even some of her teachers. “I’d grown taller than my mom by the time I was thirteen, and I really liked that. …….. It felt good, too, to be almost as tall as my dad (who was six feet three, weighed over two hundred pounds), so he’d have to treat me more like an equal than just a child. …….. Most of all it felt good to be as tall as, in some cases taller than my teachers. Not one of the Rocky River female teachers was Ugly Girl’s height, and I always made sure I stood straight, like a West Point cadet, when I spoke with them.” (Oates, 2002). Furthermore in the reference, Ursula mentions that she likes being taller than anyone. It seems that Ursula takes some pleasures and advantages from her [un]usual body to become, somehow, more powerful. Thus, I will discuss that issue in other paragraphs. The same as the first novel, the second novel too, shows the body image of Franky (the protagonist of Freaky Green Eyes). She is viewed to have [ab]normal body. In Franky’s case it is her eyes, those are green, which some people think the eyes are creepy.
In Sari’s thesis, she quotes Kristeva’s Power of Horror that an image of a body which inappropriate, according to society agreement, will be looked as an ‘eyesore’ for the agreement. For example, some people in Ursula’s life feel disturb by her height. It is revealed when Grandma Riggs asks her, “Ursula, dear, when are you going to stop growing?” (Oates, 2002). It indicates that Ursula’s height fittingly disturbs her grandma because ‘girl’ supposes to have that kind of height in her age. Evidently, that [un]usual height of Ursula has upset the social construction of a female body which has supposed to be shorter than male[s] and people around her seem to be disrupted by her tallness.
Ursula’s body somehow annoys people, however Ursula too, thinks like that. For example, she uses to be on a swimming team at junior high school but she feels that she doesn’t fit in the ‘system’ — , because of her body doesn’t have the ideal shape of a female body like all of her friends when they are wearing swimsuit. At that time, she realizes that is how her body should look like because it is constructed by people, culture, and society. The development of Ursula’s body is faster than any girl at her age. Then, she quits and changes to other sports that she considers proper for her body. As the result, because of her body image doesn’t fit in what people defines as a normal body for a female, it makes Ursula calls herself as Ugly Girl, with big U and G. This state is also reviewed in the thesis; I quote “Jika tubuhnya dipandang menjijikan maka citra dirinya pun akan mengikuti seiring citra tubuh.” (Sari, 2011). Since her body is looked as an abnormal body by people, consequently Ursula too looks it that way. Then, Ursula embraces the fact that she is different and she is not one of the beautiful girls, who has normal height, by calling herself as Ugly Girl, even though no one has ever calls her Ugly Girl. People in school know and call her as Big Girl or Big Ursula, but they do think that she is weird, “Wow! Big Ursula”….. “Ursula Riggs! She’s weird”…… (Oates, 2002), and it seems that a girl like her did not proper to be liked by a guy. “They’re just friends, obviously. No normal guy would be attracted to Big Ursula” (Oates, 2002). They believe a big girl like Ursula will never find a guy who likes her because she is a weird girl who has big body. However, I think people consider Ursula as a weird girl because she too thinks she needs no friends, then she doesn’t socialize much and always gives them kind of ‘I don’t need you’ impression. Of course, people will avoid her.
Conversely, it will be a little bit different for Franky. Freaky Green Eyes comes to her because of a guy, Cameron, who tries to rape her but she fights back and then he says, “He’s staring at me saying, ‘You f-freak! You should see your eyes! Freaky Green Eyes! You’re crazy!’” (Oates, 2003). After that incident she takes Freaky Green Eyes as a part of her life because like she says, “FREAKY GREEN EYES came to me. FREAKY GREEN EYES saved my life.”(Oates, 2003). Ursula accepts the idea of Ugly Girl without any urge to suppress her, while Franky has resentment to suppress Freaky, “In the bathroom mirror Freaky Green Eyes glares at me. I feel a crazy urge to claw at those eyes.” (Oates, 2003). I think it is a little bit different for Franky. Freaky doesn’t come to her life because social construction of a normal female body and/or her felling about having unusual body, but because there is a person who calls her like that. That is the result of her struggle to fight the oppressor [which is Cameron who almost rapes her] which in this case saves her life. So in my opinion she feels like she owes Freaky her life and doesn’t have much option than let her to stay, but in other way she doesn’t really like the fact that someone thinks her as a freak. I believe that’s why Franky doesn’t embrace Freaky as fast as Ursula embraces Ugly Girl.
2. The thesis by Johnson. This thesis I find useful to my research because it uses literature theory about body and beauty image and discusses the process of self-critique which I recognize it happens in both novels, for example “There are four themes or patterns identified, within the domain of the self-critique process. The four themes are comparing, valuing, desiring and striving.” (Johnson, 1994). However, I notice the step for these protagonists is a little different. They are comparing, valuing, desiring and accepting.
Johnson states the first step is comparing. “The first step was comparing was intertwined with what they perceived that others thought of them. This formed what they thought of themselves…”(Johnson, 1994). The assessment of Ursula and Franky body approach them to see what people and/or social construction think. At first, none of them realizes that their bodies are different from the others until someone tells them. They see and hear what other people say and show if their bodies are [un]usual. Afterward, they will actually compare their bodies with others and find out that they don’t have an ideal image of a female body, “Through comparison, the participants developed a vision, an idealized image and a belief about how they should have looked.” (Johnson, 1994).
The second step is valuing, through valuing they seek recognition from other people to prove if they have benefit for society. In this step, they need to have approval from other people. Ursula and Franky, they feel the need to be admired and good at something. I think the reason behind this is because they think they are already lack of something, so they have to prove to people that they still have value. However if they fail, it will make them depress, upset and confuse. It happens at Ursula when she fails at Basket competition. I see that Ursula and Franky are somehow still confuse about themselves, and both of them picture themselves as what people say, as Johnson says if people especially women discover their true-self over other people’s eye. That is why both of them believe what other people judge about their bodies become what they really are.
The third and fourth steps from Johnson’s thesis are desiring and striving. From what I notice from the novels, it has different step from what this thesis states. Because the thesis is from nursing department, it states that the problems of desiring and striving make them have eating disorder, anorexic and other sickness result from dieting. However, both of the protagonists in these novels don’t do striving which is diet or make an effort to change themselves into the body they admire. Even though, they still have desiring other bodies. They have an ideal body image of how the body should look. The body Ursula admire is her little sister, “My kid sister’s eyes were so beautiful, warm and dark and fine-lashed like a doll’s eyes, that sometimes it was hard for Ugly Girl to be jealous of her.”(Oates, 2002). As same as Franky, her sister, “She was a dreamy ten-year-old with a sweet, shy disposition and beautiful dark eyes no one would ever call freaky.”(Oates, 2003).
As I see for these protagonists, the last step is accepting. Yet, they don’t make changes or in this case dieting to have an ideal body image which is constructed by society. They learn to accept their physical bodies and they use it to gain something than normal bodies can have. They want to be free from patriarchy culture. Then, I find Johnson writes, “Young women realize that beauty lends them limited power although beauty and youth provide only temporary acceptance and attention. The Cult of beauty is a survival strategy that allows women to maneuver safely around rather than threaten men’s privilege and power.” (Johnson, 1994). However, this condition doesn’t happen in Ursula. She chooses to make her body becomes taller and muscular to threaten male’s privilege and power so she can be free from that. Because if she chooses to become pretty, she has to bow to male’s power while what she wants is to exceed them.
3. Thesis by Helga Valborg Steinarsdóttir. This thesis discusses a grotesque body; however it is different with the first thesis. It focuses on the effect of the female who has grotesque body and people around her. This thesis argues that if a female embraces the physicality of her bodies, it will be a premise for female empowerment and can help reorder the social construction of the female bodies. And it explains the acceptance of grotesque physicality can be a weapon to defend itself against the perceived threat of it.
Steinarsdóttir claims that a female with a normal and ‘controllable’ body can easily expose and bent down to male’s hierarchy, which means if a female with an abnormal and uncontrollable body cannot be like. That is way this matter (abnormal and uncontrollable body) really helps Ursula because she realizes by embracing her body, she does not have to be afraid to confront people especially guy when she has to. It is like she has some kind of ‘privilege’ to behave like that. “Unlike other girls, I didn’t shrink away like a balloon deflating if guys teased me or said crude things meant to embarrass. … As if Ugly Girl would go down for any guy, or any human being, ever!” (Oates, 2002). Then, they seem to be intimidated by her because Ursula embraces Ugly Girl and people seem to avoid for making a contact with her even when they have to. Ugly girl gives Ursula more strength and power, and when she becomes Ugly Girl, it makes her doesn’t afraid of anything. Ugly Girl gives the chilly feel.
For Franky, that quote, actually, happens for a while. Franky obeys her father even though she knows if Freaky knows that he lies about her mom. Freaky doesn’t have much use for Freaky because when she uses Freaky to oppose people, she always gets punishment. She can’t antagonize the authority of man. It is like, people around her especially her father tries to make her behaves like a ‘proper’ girl, and when she doesn’t she gets punishment by her dad. She is being hits, slaps, shake until she gets traumatize to try to confront him again. This is another reason why Franky needs time to accept the whole Freaky. Even when she finally decides to oppose his father, she is still afraid of the idea of his anger. This situation constructs that a girl should behave precisely like what their parent/culture tell her and when the girl rebels them, she will get penalty. When she accepted a whole Freaky Green Eyes, Freaky had Franky to see the truth, to be brave and to release herself from her father’s authority.
In her thesis, Steinarsdóttir argues that when there is someone who sees them without think if their grotesque bodies are beauty rather than disgusting, that only happens to people who can accept something with unusual appealing, it will be the time they will see a beauty in themselves. It is exactly what happens to Ursula after Matt, the Big Mouth, tells her, “You’re beautiful, Ursula. Most like other girls but – in your own way. Special.” (Oates, 2002). And to Franky when she accepts that her eyes are beautiful green like her mom’s. I realize that Ugly Girl and Freaky Green Eyes, both of them are layers or suits for the protagonists. The suits will fit for some of the events but not all of it because there is time when both of them don’t have to put their ‘special suits’ to interact, to see, or to hear people.
4. The last work I’d like to review is a thesis by Katie M. Kanagawa. Kanagawa analyzes adolescent girl who behaves violence toward people as a result of their oppressions. This thesis identifies that this behavior can occur because there is oppression in the girl that emerges aggressive behavior. This thesis is useful to my research because the behavior presents in both novels. They act ‘violence’ and intimidate people who oppress them, and they gain power and pleasure upon people anxiety.
The thesis explains that “These narratives’ textual ambivalence and their feminist potential by exploring the dialectical processes of female sexual victimization and empowerment that they consistently produce.” (Kanagawa, 2009). What I conclude form that sentence is they intentionally built power and their confidence to produce such a behavior, it especially shows in Ursula. She constantly makes her body even more muscular. She even becomes vegetarian to make sure that whatever she eats doesn’t contain fat. According to Kanagawa’s statement, Ursula does all of that in order to maintain her body shape (an unlike women body shape) in order to maintain her position as a girl avenger by keeping her body like that.
Kanagawa helps me to recognize violence act of the protagonists. According to Kanagawa’s opinion in the thesis the oppression behavior doesn’t always happen in the protagonist’s everyday life. For example, when Ursula is with Matt or when she feels that her parents don’t annoy her, or when she is in happy mood. Ursula doesn’t have to be Ugly Girl, “It was strange about Ugly Girl. She was like a uniform, or a skin, I could slip into, but she wasn’t right for all occasion.”(Oates, 2002). This kind of behavior will not show if there is nothing that trigger the behavior in the first place because this matter only happens when Ursula feels threaten, disturb, and need to intimidate people. Ursula acts rude and sarcastic to make people respects and scares of her by using her [un]usual body as a tool to terrorize people. And when she does she takes pleasure and excitement from people’s anxiousness.
It is different for Franky; she doesn’t consistently produce Freaky because her [un]usual body is her eyes. I think it because her eyes are something that she can’t generate. You can’t make your eyes to be more muscular and beside Franky’s green eyes don’t really make people feel intimidate or disturb, even some people think they are pretty. Freaky comes to Franky because the almost-rape accident, her braveness to attack and reject Cameron makes him embarrass and breaks his pride as man. The man authority, in this case Cameron desire to rape Franky, which she ‘must’ follow and maybe Cameron isn’t expecting if Franky will disobey him, makes him says about Franky’s eyes to gain his pride again. So, her eyes only seem annoying for Cameron. Thus, I see that Franky knows she cannot use Freaky as a suit [as much as Ursula did] because Freaky Green Eyes is only a voice inside her head that can see and know what Franky can’t accept, for example the fact that her father is the one who kills her mom.
Furthermore, it is what Ugly Girl does as a suit for Ursula. Kanagawa observes if the uses of an aggressive act such as confronting, assaulting, and attacking her is in order for achieving her object. It happens to Ursula when she realizes who the informers which reports Matt to the principal with ‘fake’ information are and the one who kidnaps Pumpkin (Matt’s dog). Ursula confronts, forces, and threats them to admit and confess what they have done.
Kanagawa declares, “Girl avenger narratives feature adolescent girl subjects who engage in acts of violence to avenge their own (or other girls’ or women’s) sexual subjugation….. Rather than reiterating the paradigm of woman-as-agent versus woman-as-victim, these narratives posit dialectical relations between experiences of resistance and domination….. Girl avenger narratives posit domination as a key context for resistance, closing the distance between seemingly contradictory experiences.” (Kanagawa, 2009). Kanagawa improves me to understand why those two protagonists do confront, strike, and force people to achieve their aims. It is because they have experienced the resistance from people’s domination that oppresses their will and their freedom.
As I have discussed my issue and the four related works, I can conclude that the protagonists in these two novels consider their bodies as grotesque body or the abnormal body. Their bodies have been constructed by people/culture and society to be abnormal body because it is different than the other. And as society constructs, they believe and take it as a way to see their own bodies. They have to through some process so they can accept their bodies. They have been comparing their bodies with other bodies, valuing themselves by getting acknowledged from people, desiring the perfect ideal body image in their minds, and the last step is accepting their bodies. By accepting their grotesque bodies, somehow they can transgress themselves from what patriarchy constructs. They can their own pleasures and their will and nothing can block them because if there is something/someone who tries to oppress, to dominate, and to oppose them, they can show them a violence behavior which other girls can’t do. The issue, the problems, and the interpretation of my future research of body and beauty image in these novels which I have already discussed, I hope my paper can support and enrich other works relating to this issue.

Work Cited

Johnson, N. P. (1994). Young Women’s Voices On Body Image: The Beauty Myth. Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia.
Kanagawa, K. M. (2009). Girl Avengers: Revising Feminist Approaches to Sexuality, Violence, and Power in Representation. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Oates, J. C. (2002). Big Mouth & Ugly Girl. New York: HarperCollins.
Oates, J. C. (2003). Freaky Green Eyes. New York: HarperCollins.
Sari, Y. P. (2011). Konstruksi Tubuh & Tehnik Epistolari dalam Tiga Novel Gotik Abad ke-19. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Standard

Body and Beauty Images in Joyce Carol Oates’ Novels

Body and Beauty Images in Joyce Carol Oates’ Novels

Dalam uraian ini, saya ingin mendiskusikan isu ini untuk menjadi usulan skripsi dengan judul Body and Beauty Image in Joyce Carol Oates’ Novels. saya menemukan isu mengenai tubuh dan kecantikan dalam dua novel karya Joyce Carol Oates, Big Mouth & Ugly Girl and Freaky Green Eyes. Masalah – masalah yang saya temukan adalah bagaimana para karakter utama dalam novel-novel ini menggambarkan tubuhnya, apakah tubuh mereka memiliki andil dalam kehidupan mereka, dan apa yang mereka rasakan mengenai tubuh mereka. Setelah menyebutkan apa saja masalahnya, saya akan menunjukan beberapa penelitian terdahulu yang berkaitan dan dapat membantu saya dalam permasalahan yang saya temukan.
Penelitian yang pertama adalah sebuah skripsi dari Jurusan Sastra Inggris Universitas Padjadjaran tahun 2011 dengan judul Konstruksi Tubuh & Tehnik Espitolari Tiga Novel Gotik Abad ke-19 oleh Yolanda Priska Sari. Dalam skripsi ini, Sari menganalisis mengenai konstruksi tubuh (tubuh grotesk) dalam tiga novel gotik. Skripsi ini mendiskusikan tubuh yang dianggap sebagai tubuh abnormal, contohnya tubuh Frankenstein. Topik tubuh dalam skripsi ini adalah konsep mengenai bagaimana sosial memandang tubuh normal dan abnormal dan bagaimana masyarakat juga si karakter menerima tubuh mereka. Permasalahan penerimaan tubuh mereka terjadi karena adanya pemikiran masyarakat mengenai bentuk tubuh normal yang diajekkan.
Dalam skripsinya, Sari menyebutkan bahwa ;
“Penggambaran tubuh normal disini merupakan penggambaran tubuh manusia pada umumnya yang sempurna, mempunyai anggota badan yang lengkap dan tinggi yang masih dalam batas normal. Penggambaran tubuh grotesk merupakan penggambaran tubuh tidak normal, seperti adanya kecacatan dalam tubuh tersebut.” (Sari, 2011).

Dari penjelesannya mengenai tubuh grotesk dapat dilihat bahwa karakter utama novel Big Mouth & Ugly Girl, Ursula Riggs juga memiliki tubuh grotesk. Ursula memiliki tubuh yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan tubuh remaja perempuan, laki – laki, bahkan beberpa gurunya.
“I’d grown taller than my mom by the time I was thirteen, and I really liked that. …….. It felt good, too, to be almost as tall as my dad (who was six feet three, weighed over two hundred pounds), so he’d have to treat me more like an equal than just a child. …….. Most of all it felt good to be as tall as, in some cases taller than my teachers. Not one of the Rocky River female teachers was Ugly Girl’s height, and I always made sure I stood straight, like a West Point cadet, when I spoke with them.” (Oates, 2002).

Dalam kutipan tersebut, Ursula juga menyebutkan bahwa dia menyukai tubuhnya yang lebih tinggi dari orang lain. Saya melihat Ursula mengambil kesenangan dan keuntungan dari tubuh grotesknya untuk menjadi lebih unggul dibanding yang lain. Akan tetapi, saya akan diskusikan isu ini pada paragraf lain. Karakter utama berikutnya, dalam novel Freaky Green Eyes, Franky, juga menunjukan penggambaran tubuh yang dilihat sebagai tubuh grotesk. Menurut, beberapa orang Franky memiliki mata berwarna hijau terang yang mengerikan.
Sari juga mengutip tulisan Power of Horror karya Kristeva bahwa tubuh yang tidak sesuai menurut persetujuan masyarakat akan dianggap sebagai perusak bagi persetujuan tersebut. Contohnya, beberapa orang dalam kehidupan Ursula merasa terganggu akan tinggi tubuhnya. Ini terlihat saat neneknya berkunjung dan bertanya pada Ursula, “Ursula, dear, when are you going to stop growing?” (Oates, 2002). Hal ini menunjukan bahwa tinggi Ursula memang menggangu Nenek Riggs karena ‘remaja perempuan’ seumur Ursula tidak seharusnya memiliki tubuh yang sedemikian tinggi. Dan lagi, tinggi tubuh Ursula telah mengganggu orang – orang konstruksi sosial mengenai tubuh perempuan yang seharusnya lebih pendek daripada laki-laki. Ursula tahu akan hal itu dan dia pun berpikir bahwa tubuhnya memang tidak normal. Contohnya, Ursula adalah seorang perenang saat dia di sekolah menengah, tapi Ursula merasa bahwa dirinya tidak cocok berada di ‘sistem’ karena tubuhnya tidak memiliki bentuk tubuh ideal remaja perempuan seperti teman – teman seusianya saat memakai pakaian renang. Pada saat itu, Ursula menyadari bahwa tubuhnya tidak sesuai dengan konstruksi masyarakat akan tubuh ideal. Ursula berhenti menjadi perenang dan beralih menjadi atlet bola basket yang dia rasa sesuai untuk ukuran tubuhnya. Memiliki tubuh yang tidak normal, Ursula memanggil dirinya sebagai Ugly Girl yang selalu ditulis dengan huruf capital untuk B dan G. Situasi ini juga dijabarkan oleh Sari sebagai pengakuan diri sebagaimana orang melihatnya,“Jika tubuhnya dipandang menjijikan maka citra dirinya pun akan mengikuti seiring citra tubuh.” (Sari, 2011).
Ursula mengakui bahwa dirinya berbeda dengan menyebut dirinya sendiri sebagai Ugly Girl meskipun tidak ada seorang pun yang pernah memanggilnya seperti itu. Teman – teman sekolahnya memanggilnya dengan sebutan Big Girl atau Big Ursula tetapi, mereka memang menganggapnya sebagai perempuan aneh, “Wow! Big Ursula”….. “Ursula Riggs! She’s weird”…… “No normal guy would be attracted to Big Ursula” (Oates, 2002). Akan tetapi, saya melihat alasan mengapa orang – orang menganggap Ursula aneh karena Ursula bersikap tidak acuh. Ursula merasa dirinya tidak membutuhkan teman, oleh karena itu dia tidak bersosialisasi dengan baik dan selalu memberikan kesan bahwa ia tidak butuh siapapun. Tentu saja, orang – orang akan menghindarinya.
Sebaliknya, gambaran tubuh bagi Franky sedikit berbeda. Dia menyebut sisi lain darinya dengan sebutan Freaky Green Eyes, nama itu muncul saat Franky hampir diperkosa oleh Cameron, “He’s staring at me saying, ‘You f-freak! You should see your eyes! Freaky Green Eyes! You’re crazy!’” (Oates, 2003). Setelah kejadian itu, Freaky Green Eyes menjadi bagian lain dari hidupnya. Franky merasa berhutang budi pada Freaky tetapi, dia juga memiliki keinginan untuk menghapus Freaky dari hidupnya.
“FREAKY GREEN EYES came to me. FREAKY GREEN EYES saved my life.”……. “In the bathroom mirror Freaky Green Eyes glares at me. I feel a crazy urge to claw at those eyes.” (Oates, 2003).

Ursula menerima Ugly Girl sebagai bagian dari dirinya tanpa ada keinginan untuk menahannya untuk muncul karena kesengangan dan keuntungan yang Ursula dapatkan saat ia menggunakan Ugly Girl, sedangkan Franky selalu berusaha keras untuk menahan Freaky. Saya melihat alasan Franky tidak bisa menerima Freaky atau keadaan tubuhnya karena Freaky Green Eyes muncul bukan dari gambaran konstruksi sosial mengenai warna mata atau tubuh yang ideal. Freaky muncul karena adanya perlawanan dari Franky terhadap Cameron. Dalam alur cerita novel ini, hanya ada dua orang yang memanggil dirinya Freaky Green Eyes yaitu Cameron dan Franky sendiri. Jadi, saya percaya disaat Freaky Green Eyes muncul dan menyelamatkan Franky, dia belum siap untuk menerima dan mengakui Freaky sebagai bagian dari dirinya.
Penelitian selanjutnya tesis dengan judul Young Women’s Voices on Body Image: The Beauty Myth oleh Nadine P. Johnson dari Universitas Dalhousie. Tesis ini merupakan penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis untuk mendapatkan gelar master dalam ilmu keperawatan. Tetapi, saya menemukan tesis ini dapat saya gunakan karena penelitian ini menggunakan teori literatur mengenai penggambaran tubuh dan kecantikan dan mendiskusikan tentang self-critique yang saya temukan dalam kedua novel. Johnson menjelaskan bahwa,
“There are four themes or patterns identified, within the domain of the self-critique process. The four themes are comparing, valuing, desiring and striving.” (Johnson, 1994).

Namun, saya melihat bahwa langkah – langkah proses self-critique yang terjadi sedikit berbeda. Langkah – langkahnya adalah comparing, valuing, desiring, and accepting.
Johnson menyebutkan bahwa langkah pertama adalah comparing (membandingkan),
“The first step was comparing was intertwined with what they perceived that others thought of them. This formed what they thought of themselves…”(Johnson, 1994).

Penilaian terhadap tubuh Ursula dan Franky membuat mereka melihat apa yang orang – orang dan konstruksi sosial pikirkan. Pada awalnya, mereka berdua tidak menyadari bahwa tubuh mereka berbeda sampai seseorang mengatakannya. Setelah itu, mereka mulai membandingkan tubuh mereka dengan tubuh orang lain dan menemukan apa yang berbeda dengan tubuh mereka, bahwa mereka tidak memiliki bentuk tubuh yang ideal bagi seorang remaja perempuan,
“Through comparison, the participants developed a vision, an idealized image and a belief about how they should have looked.” (Johnson, 1994).

Langkah kedua adalah valuing (menghargai). Melalui valuing mereka mencari pengakuan dari orang lain untuk membuktikan bahwa mereka berguna untuk masyarakat. Dalam langkah ini, mereka membutuhkan apresiasi dari orang lain. Ursula dan Franky menunjukan bahwa mereka ingin dikagumi dan diakui atas sesuatu. Menurut saya, alasan mereka adalah karena mereka merasa memiliki kekurangan, mereka berharap dapat menutupi kekurangan tersebut. Akan tetapi, apabila mereka gagal, itu akan membuat mereka depresi dan kecewa. Situasi ini terjadi saat Ursula kalah dalam kompetisi basket dan saat Franky membantah perkataan ayahnya. Saya melihat bahwa Ursula dan Franky terkadang masih merasakan kebingungan mengenai diri mereka sendiri, dan mereka berdua menggambarkan diri mereka seperti apa yang orang lain gambarkan seperti yang Johnson katakan apabila orang – orang terutama perempuan menemukan jati diri mereka melalui penilaian orang lain. Inilah alasannya mengapa mereka berdua percaya apa yang orang lain pikirkan mengenai tubuh mereka adalah mereka yang sesungguhnya.
Langkah ketiga dan keempat adalah desiring (mengagumi) dan striving (bekerja keras). Saya memperhatikan bahwa kedua novel ini memiliki langkah akhir yang berbeda. Johnson berpendapat bahwa Desiring dan striving terjadi saat seseorang ingin mengubah bentuk tubuh mereka menjadi bentuk ideal yang dapat mengakibatkan makan yang tidak teratur, anoreksia dan penyakit lainnya yang berasal dari proses diet. Akan tetapi, dalam teks kedua karakter ini tidak melakukan diet ataupun usaha untuk mengubah bentuk tubuh mereka menjadi bentuk yang mereka kagumi. Tubuh yang Ursula kagumi adalah adik perempuannya,
“My kid sister’s eyes were so beautiful, warm and dark and fine-lashed like a doll’s eyes, that sometimes it was hard for Ugly Girl to be jealous of her.”(Oates, 2002).

Begitu juga dengan Franky, “She was a dreamy ten-year-old with a sweet, shy disposition and beautiful dark eyes no one would ever call freaky.”(Oates, 2003). Menurut saya, langkah terakhir yang terjadi dalam teks adalah accepting (menerima). Mereka belajar untuk menerima tubuh mereka dan menggunakannya untuk mendapatkan sesuatu yang mereka sadari tidak dapat didapatkan oleh tubuh ‘normal’. Tubuh mereka yang dianggap merusak sistem membuat mereka dapat berbuat sesuatu diluar sistem. Contohnya, saat perempuan lainnya tidak bisa berhadapan dengan laki – laki karena bentuk tubuh mereka yang normal membuat mereka harus ‘tunduk’, Ursula tidak harus mengalami hal itu dan itu memberikannya kesenangan tersendiri. Selain itu, saat Franky menerima Freaky, Franky dapat keluar dari tekanan ayahnya dan dapat mengetahui apa yang sesungguhnya terjadi. Johnson juga berpendapat bahwa,
“Young women realize that beauty lends them limited power although beauty and youth provide only temporary acceptance and attention. The Cult of beauty is a survival strategy that allows women to maneuver safely around rather than threaten men’s privilege and power.” (Johnson, 1994).

Namun, kondisi ini tidak terjadi ada Ursula. Dia memilih untuk membuat tubuhnya lebih tinggi dan tegap untuk mengancam hak istimewa dan kekuatan laki – laki. Menurut saya, Ursula sadar apabila dia berusaha untuk membentuk tubuhnya menjadi apa yang konstruksi masyarakat inginkan, dia harus mengakui kekuasaan laki – laki.
Penelitian yang terakhir sebuah disertasi dalam ranah kajian feminis dari Universitas California dengan judul Girl Avengers: Revising Feminist Approaches to Sexuality, Violence, and Power in Representation oleh Katie M. Kanagawa. Penelitian yang terakhir adalah disertasi yang menganalisis tentang perilaku kekerasan seorang remaja perempuan terhadap orang yang mengopresi mereka. Disertasi ini mengidentifikasi bahwa perilaku ini muncul karena adanya opresi terhadap mereka. Perlawanan ini pun terjadi di dalam teks. Ursula dan Franky melawan dan mengintimidasi orang – orang yang menekan mereka, dan mereka juga memperoleh kesenangan dan kekuasaan dari kecemasan orang lain.
Kanagawa menjelaskan bahwa mereka sengaja membentuk kuasa dan kepercayaan diri mereka untuk memperoleh perilaku itu, terutama Ursula.
“These narratives’ textual ambivalence and their feminist potential by exploring the dialectical processes of female sexual victimization and empowerment that they consistently produce.” (Kanagawa, 2009).

Dia terus membentuk tubuhnya menjadi lebih kuat. Menurut pendapat Kanagawa, Ursula melakukan hal itu untuk mempertahankan bentuk tubuhnya (bentuk tubuh yang tidak seperti perempuan) dengan maksud untuk mempertahankan posisinya sebagai seorang girl avenger. Akan tetapi perilaku ini tidak akan terjadi apabila tidak adanya tekanan yang datang dari lawan karakter. Contohnya, ketika Ursula sedang bersama Matt atau ketika orang tuanya tidak mengganggu Ursula, dia tidak menjadi Ugly Girl. Ini seakan – akan menjadikan Ugly Girl hanyalah sebuah baju special yang hanya bisa dikenakan pada saat yang tepat, Ursula tidak akan mengenakan ‘bajunya’ apabila ia tidak merasa perlu.
“It was strange about Ugly Girl. She was like a uniform, or a skin, I could slip into, but she wasn’t right for all occasion.”(Oates, 2002).

Hal ini berbeda bagi Franky, dia tidak terus – menerus menggunakan Freaky. Menurut saya hal ini dikarenakan Freaky muncul akibat peristiwa pemerkosaan yang hampir Franky alami. Dalam kasus ini, penolakan yang dilakukan oleh Franky mengejutkan Cameron. Cameron yang mendapatkan penolakan melontarkan umpatan. Saya tidak yakin apakan mata Franky benar – benar mengganggu Cameron atau umpatan itu dia lontarkan hanya karena penolakan yang terjadi. Dengan demikian, saya mengerti mengapa Franky tidak dapat menggunakan Freaky sebagai baju seperti Ursula karena Freaky hanyalah mata hijau yang berwujudkan suara di dalam kepala Franky. Franky selalu mendengar apa yang Freaky katakan, dia tidak bisa melepas atau menghilangkan suara itu. Pilihannya hanya ada dua, memilih untuk mendengarkan Freaky atau tidak.
Kanagawa menjabarkan bahwa,
“Girl avenger narratives feature adolescent girl subjects who engage in acts of violence to avenge their own (or other girls’ or women’s) sexual subjugation….. Rather than reiterating the paradigm of woman-as-agent versus woman-as-victim, these narratives posit dialectical relations between experiences of resistance and domination….. Girl avenger narratives posit domination as a key context for resistance, closing the distance between seemingly contradictory experiences.” (Kanagawa, 2009).

Kanagawa membantu saya untuk mengerti mengapa kedua karakter utama tersebut melakukan perlawanan untuk mencapai tujuan mereka. Hal ini dikarenakan mereka telah mengalami perlawanan dari dominasi orang lain yang telah menekan keinginan dan kebebasan mereka.
Kesimpulan yang saya dapatkan setelah menjelaskan keempat penelitian terdahulu ini adalah teks ini menyajikan kedua karakter yang memiliki tubuh grotesk. Tubuh mereka telah dikonstrusikan oleh orang – orang/budaya dan lingkungan mereka untuk dikelompokan sebagai tubuh abnormal, dan mereka percaya seperti itulah tubuh mereka. Kedua teks novel telah menunjukan bahwa para karakter telah melalui beberapa proses untuk akhirnya menerima tubuh mereka, membandingkan dengan tubuh lain, menghargai tubuh mereka sendiri dengan cara mendapatkan pengakuan dari orang lain, mendambakan tubuh ideal dalam benak mereka, dan ahirnya menerima bentuk tubuh mereka apa adanya. Dengan menerima tubuh grotesk mereka, itu membuat mereka dapat keluar dari konstruksi patriarki. Mereka dapat melawan, mendominasi dan melakukan perilaku menantang yang tidak dapat dilakukan oleh karakter lain. Isu, permasalahan, dan permbahasan dari penelitian saya ini mengenai body and beauty images dalam novel – novel ini, saya harap dapat mendukung dan meperkaya penelitian mengenai isu yang sama.
Work Cited
Johnson, N. P. (1994). Young Women’s Voices On Body Image: The Beauty Myth. Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia.
Kanagawa, K. M. (2009). Girl Avengers: Revising Feminist Approaches to Sexuality, Violence, and Power in Representation. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Oates, J. C. (2002). Big Mouth & Ugly Girl. New York: HarperCollins.
Oates, J. C. (2003). Freaky Green Eyes. New York: HarperCollins.
Sari, Y. P. (2011). Konstruksi Tubuh & Tehnik Epistolari dalam Tiga Novel Gotik Abad ke-19. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Standard

Relationship between Women and Men

Relationship between Women and Men

Women and men, different genders are always getting along with “harmony”, but never balance. Relationship between masculine and feminine cannot be treated as equal. There is must be something that marked masculine or feminine. In society, every masculine things are always more powerful than feminine. Therefore, it is hard to imagine a more perfect example of a particular relationship between two of it,said Cixous in Castration or Decapitation. Masculine tries to control feminine by everything that they can take over. Cixous also states that masculine consists of trying to make a soldiernof feminine by force. What I see that feminine do not aware if they are being control by masculine. Cixous said it because the threat of decapitation, but eventhough they not lose their head, they are still losing their authority by turning into machine. They keep losing it because they cannot take order seriously, that is what Cixous said. However in my opinion, women can take order seriously if men and society do not judge and make them like that because Cixous ststed that women is afraid by decapitation and men is also afraid by castration that women creates. Eventhough both of women and men do not realise it. In every relationship that are related in both genders is always women who threats men by castration, sothen men also make their masculinity to control women by women’s fear of decapitation.

Refference

Cixous, Helene. 1981. Castration of Decapitation. Pg. 41-55

Standard

Red Sun

Red sun shone above the horizon teasing her heart by its color
And the cold breeze played her hair as it dancing with angels
A voice called her, making her comb the space to notice
The voice was from the light, beckoning her to reach the sea

The voice and the light bewitched her soul to obey
Getting on feet to touch and feel the red sea
The red sand chafing her barefoot but she kept walking
Feeling the wave reaching and cherish her toes

Her hands have already tasted the sweetness of red sea
Making her dress swaying with the current
The voice continued stirring her to follow the light to the deep-sea
Dazzling her wits and clearing the grits from her dress

She got closer to the light, deeper to the sea
But it was not hot and not cold
There was someone floating under the light
And her heart was pounding with excitement

Once he took her hand and guide her way to the depth
The red sun was blinking upon them
As he gone so did she
The red sea swallowed the red sun and made it dark.

Standard

Perempuan dalam Budaya Patriarki

 image

 

Photo by Google, search key Gender ads

 

Gambar diatas menampilkan dua orang dengan jenis kelamin (gender) yang berbeda. Perempuan dan Laki-laki. Laki-laki itu memasukkan baju-baju kotor kedalam mesin cuci, yang ternyata dari samping mesin cuci itu, bisa terlihat atau ‘transparan’, yaitu seorang perempuan sedang mencucikan pakaian-pakaian kotor si laki-laki. Menurut saya, saya melihat metafora seperti ini hampir mencerminkan kondisi posisi Antara perempuan dan laki-laki dalam ranah kehidupan. Kebudayaan manusia yang terbentuk akibat doktrin-doktrin yang di bentuk dalam setiap aspek kehidupan dan aktifitas-aktifitas manusia,  Bekker memberikan konsep, “budaya adalah hasil dari setiap aktifitas manusia.”. Kemudian pstriarki pun menjadi salah satu budaya manusia.

 

Ketimpangan gender yang didominasi oleh lebih tingginya ‘kedudukan’ laki-laki daripada perempuan telah menjadi hal yang dipercayai hampir oleh semua orang. Perbicangan mengenai ‘kedudukan’ ini bahkan ‘didukung’ dan/atau ‘diperkuat’ oleh budaya, agama, moral, bahasa, sastra, sejarah, dan norma. Seluruh aspek kehidupan mendukung laki-laki atau hal-hal yang bernilai maskulin sebagai sesuatu yang dianggap lebih tinggi

 

Ideologi patriarki yang terus bertahan sejak dulu hingga saat ini ternyata bukan hanya dilanggengkan oleh aspek-aspek yang telah saya sebutkan sebelumnya, meskipun ideologi ini menghasilkan kedudukan gender yang tidak setara dan meninggikan posisi laki-laki dan/atau maskulinitas dalam kehidupan sosial ternyata dalam praktik kelangsungan ideologi ini diteruskan ke generasi-generasi baru oleh kaum perempuan itu sendiri. Seperti yang dikatakan oleh Toril Moi, “it follows that the very fact of being female does not necessarily guarantee a feminist approach.” (hal. 120) tidak semua perempuan merupakan penganut ideologi feminis, sebab pada kenyataan perempuanlah yang melanggengkan patriarki. Seorang Ibu, perempuan, mengajarkan pada anaknya, perempuan, bahwa dia harus dapat dan/atau mahir dalam mengerjakan ‘tugas’ perempuan seperti memasak, menjahit, membersihkan rumah, dan bermain dengan hal-hal yang feminin, terikat oleh hal-hal taboo, tidak diperbolehkan bermain permainan yang bersifat maskulin seperti bola, mobil. Sedangkan anak laki-laki diperbolehkan melakukan apapun yang mereka mau. Terlebih lagi bahwa perempuan mempunyai 3 kewajiban yang selalu membayangi hidupnya, anak yang berbakti pada orang tua, kelak besar nanti mengabdi kepada suami, dan setelah mempunyai anak harus merawat anak dengan sebaik mungkin, seperti yang Shoshana Felman paparkan (hal. 2) “The social role assigned to the woman is that of serving an image, authoritative and central, of man: a woman is a first and foremost a daughter/ a mother/ a wife.” Bahkan dalam agama,  disebutkan bahwa perempuan (istri) diwajibkan ‘berbakti’ kepada suaminya.

 

Toril Moi juga berpendapat (hal,. 118), “there is no pure feminist or female space from which we can speak. All ideas, including feminist ones, are in this sense ‘contaminated’ by patriarchal ideology.”  Pandangan ini memaparkan bagaimana ideologi feminis ataupun perempuan tidak ada yang murni menolak ideologi patriarki karena semua gagasan, termasuk feminis, sudah terkontaminasi oleh ideologi patriarki. Dengan kata lain, tidak hanya laki-laki yang mendapatkan keuntungan dalam ideologi ini, melainkan juga perempuan. Perempuan mendapatkan keuntungan yang perempuan sendiri ‘nikmati’, contohnya, karena perempuan dianggap mahluk yang lebih ‘lemah’ daripada laki-laki dalam situasi tertentu, seperti ada perempuan yang berdiri di dalam bus (tidak mendapakan tempat duduk) laki-laki ‘merasa berkewajiban’ dan perempuan ‘merasa lebih berhak’ untuk duduk, dengan alasan ‘norma’ kesopanan, yang lagi-lagi ideologi patriarki ‘dibungkus’ kedalam norma.

 

Perempuan selalu diposisikan dalam keadaan pasif, itulah yang diciptakan oleh patriarki untuk perempuan. Keadaan ini sangat terlihat dalam karya-karya sastra, seperti; novel, drama, puisi, bahkan dalam cerita anak-anak.“From dream to dream, and always in second position,” pendapat yang dikemukakan oleh Helene Cixous (hal. 43) ungkapkan. Contohnya dalam cerita dongeng untuk anak-anak, seperti Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, dan Snow White. Mereka adalah perempuan yang bernasib malang dan baru bisa bahagia setelah ‘diselamatkan’ oleh laki-laki. Hal ini juga diperkuat oleh moral dan norma. Tidaklah sesuai dengan moral dan norma apabila perempuan menjadi individu yang lebih agresif daripada laki-laki. Perempuan selalu menjadi pihak yang ‘menunggu’ (pasif) laki-laki untuk bergerak lebih dulu, dengan alasan ‘sudah kodratnya’ atau malu. Begitu juga dalam sejarah sastra, sebelum tahun 1960an penulis perempuan tidak bisa menerbitkan tulisanya menggunakan nama asli, melainkan menggunakan nama laki-laki sebagai nama pena, setelah itu tulisannya baru bisa dipublikasikan. Dalam bahasa, bahasa Inggris salah satunya, bahasa Inggris untuk perempuan adalah Woman yang merupakan kepanjangan dari bahasa Inggris untuk laki-laki Man.

 

Kuatnya doktrin yang ‘mencuci’ otak baik laki-laki dan perempuan membuat patriarki sebagai salah satu budaya yang sulit untuk dihilangkan yang ada di Indonesia, bahkan di dunia.  Akan tetapi sebagai perempuan kita harus bisa memilah dan hati-hati akan ideologi patriarki, seperti tagline yang tertulis pada iklan “Life is too short for THE WRONG JOB”

 

Bibliography

 

Cixous, H. (1981). Castration or Decapitation. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(1), 43.

 

Felman, S. (1975). Woman and Madness. Diactitics, 5(04), 2.

 

Moi, T. (1989). Feminist, Female, Feminine. The Feminist Reader, 118-120.

 

 

 

Standard

Representation

According to Mitchell almost every aspect of life is about representation. Especially in literature just like point of view from Plato and Aristotle, regarded literature as the simply one form of representation. However, before we know about what representation is, we also have to know about presentation.

Humphrys and William’s opinion about presentation is the way in which various forms of information is set out and appears before the audience for which it is intended and according to Mitchell representation is one thing stands for one other thing.

In representation’s case, what are things that can be represented? What represent what? The questions have answered by Mitchell’s point of view, the common forms of representation is always of something or someone, by something or someone, to someone. He assume representation cannot exist without a person, we can always represent anything or anyone by anything or anyone but we can only represent that to people.

However, Mitchell also said that the represented object may even disappear when the medium turn itself back on its own codes, engaging in self-reflexive play. Therefore the differences between presentation and representation are in the object. The object in representation are disappears because somehow the thing which is represented is something that invisible, unpicturable, even unspeakable (God, the soul, the author’s intention). Then, the thing representing is not physically but the concept or image of the object.

When something or someone is represented by something or someone, and that something or someone is absence, people accept. However, by what mechanism that something or someone can represent other thing legitimate? There are some opinions about this matter. Mitchell assume that when something stands for something to somebody, it does so by virtue of a kind of social agreement which once understood need not be restated on every occasion7. In addition Rehfeld in his book1 also has same opinion as Mitchell that representative need social agreement to represent something. In political representation, Rehfeld argues that in some countries political representatives are elected by groups of voters who live in the same place, whether that location is a province, state, district, of municipality and these feature form a default position derived from the limiting conditions of any plausible theory of legitimate political representation representatives should be accountable to those they represent. However semioticians generally differentiate three types of representational relationship under the names of icon (based on resemblance), symbol (not based on resemblance), and index (explain standing for like physical proximity or connectedness).

Humphyrs, Graham and Michael Williams. 2005. Presenting and Representing Environments. Netherlands : Springer
Mitchell, W.J.T. 1995. “Representation.” Critical Terms for Literary Study. Ed Frank Lentricchia. The University of Chicago Press. pg. 11-21.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency. New York : Cambridge University Press